Damus
Cyph3rp9nk · 2w
For Ted Kaczynski, dismantling the state did not solve the core problem, because control would simply shift to large organizations, experts, technical networks, and corporations. In fact, he argued th...
leadbyexample profile picture
By now I think you might be trolling and having some fat laughs.

You keep bashing anarchocapitalism, which is just a name given for convenience to deductive ethics, and pushing agorism which I am not sure you know what it actually is.
Unless your view is collectivist in nature, and thus incompatible with agorism, anarchocapitalism is the only framework where the ethics of private property is actually respected, and to which agorism adheres.
But maybe you are against private property, I don't know anymore.
3❤️1
Cyph3rp9nk · 2w
I've made my position pretty clear. I'm not trolling; the problem is you and others like you—when the ideas a man puts forward don't align with your desires, you lose your minds. You need to read more and better, because you lack both the ability to comprehend what you read and the capacity for ...
Jacob · 2w
Dismantling the State would probably just lead to someone ceasing power. With Bitcoin we have a shot at limiting State power. If governments Couldnt print monteret money the illusion of free stuff would be harder to uphold. This would most likely lead to a significtly smaller and weaker State.