NIP-22 contains a specific restriction against using kind 1111 in reply to kind 1. It was added because the restriction makes no logical sense and serves no useful purpose, so it needed to be spelled ...
I'm trying to follow this. So NIP-22 says that you shouldn't respond to kind 1 events with kind 1111 events, and you say that restriction is completely unnecessary and makes no sense. And then you're saying that clients that honor the restriction don't display your kind 1111 responses to other people's notes, right?
But is there any self-serving motive behind not displaying 1111 responses to kind-1 events? Any unjust enrichment? I'm trying to understand the intrigue, if any.
But is there any self-serving motive behind not displaying 1111 responses to kind-1 events? Any unjust enrichment? I'm trying to understand the intrigue, if any.
1