From the perspective of regular users, inscriptions are merely inefficient transactions. Inscription TXs use more bytes than are strictly necessary for the sats transferred. But efficiency is, to a degree, subjective. Single-sig is more efficient than multisig in terms of bytes, but multisig offers...

Someone understands subjective value!

Yes we can not stop it, nor should we. But are you as exited about a future with a bitcoin blockhains full of rich people's jpegs as opposed to a future with a blockchain full off developing world people's channel open and close transactions? To me it higligt that bitcoins utility is threatened by...

If you mentally decouple bitcoin from "money" and instead think of it like "truth"... Then inscriptions don't really seem that bad, I'd even say they're a good thing, an indelible lesson on this immutable historical record.

I thought bitcoin was designed to be used as money not a jpeg repository. It’s okay to point out the chain is being spammed by participants that are not using bitcoin as money.

"Mentally decouple" from the original purpose of bitcoin (think white paper)? I hope this is resolved one way or another or the people bitcoin is meant to save will suffer (poor, middle class, developing nations etc...) and much work, that has already been done, could be for nought. I view this ...

I think you are right that bitcoin should be for money. But not because it was the original intent, fuck Satoshi, kill your heroes, it should be money because i belive that is where it will do the biggest positive impact on the world.