Damus
Dave Wilburn :donor: · 1w
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpq7yf7cxzxz4kwf24zmflvyqqtrylsjwm5q9a074u5ger57rmzz0aqe544dh I think the issue is more around the infeasibility of managing an embargo that large...
Taggart :ifin: profile picture
@nprofile1q... I am confused why we're talking specifically about getting access to no-guardrail models when that's not what happened. Hugging Face wasn't enrolled in Anthropic's Cyber Verification Program, which is a far cry from "no guardrails." Whether the specific implementation of the CVP is effective, well, anecdotally it's still rather cautious. But the onboarding process is what it is. I don't see that as the direct issue here.

If you're talking about no-guardrails models like the one OpenAI created and getting access to that, well, I agree that nobody should have access to them. I'd much rather we didn't build them at all. But here they are.

And if states are interested, as they obviously are, then the solution to access should not be the domain of corporations.

Fundamentally we need to decide if these things are weapons or can be used as weapons, or if they're not. And if they are, we need a system of laws and policies to handle them.

Will that happen before major harm? I'm not optimistic.
1
Dave Wilburn :donor: · 1w
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpq7yf7cxzxz4kwf24zmflvyqqtrylsjwm5q9a074u5ger57rmzz0aqe544dh So, correct me if I'm wrong, but Hugging Face ran into a brick wall early in their incident response process when they were blocked by one or more models from analyzing security log da...