The only way the utxo set is less stressed under a bip-110 future is if you assume the advocates are correct and spammers will leave the chain because we have signaled that they are not wanted. They a...
Fair technical concern around the bip-110 attempt to eliminate inscriptions and dust bloat. I’d appreciate a more nuanced debate around its merits and risks from folks who aren’t battling their own egos….”coretards vs knotzies” isn’t constructive for the node runners.
I still can’t make the jump from your concern around spam, to Core’s position of “let’s unilaterally blow out op return to create an unlimited data dumpster so the spammers have a place to party outside of the utxo set”
The unwillingness of Core to walk back a very contentious change, which has had significant consequences, is beyond me. Had they not made this move in V30, we’d likely not be looking at a soft fork proposal.
Perhaps a fight over Bitcoins direction was inevitable.
Appreciate the technical explanation of your concerns.
I still can’t make the jump from your concern around spam, to Core’s position of “let’s unilaterally blow out op return to create an unlimited data dumpster so the spammers have a place to party outside of the utxo set”
The unwillingness of Core to walk back a very contentious change, which has had significant consequences, is beyond me. Had they not made this move in V30, we’d likely not be looking at a soft fork proposal.
Perhaps a fight over Bitcoins direction was inevitable.
Appreciate the technical explanation of your concerns.
2
