Have you not read Douthat? Brooks? Stephens? Allowing controversial guest essays like these is the very definition of free speech. Branding NYT as hostile and Marxist because of 3 cherry picked guest columns is laughable.

This is ridiculous 🤦🏻‍♂️

I don't know anyone who pays for or reads the NY slimes

You should get into politics so you can quit bringing this shit into bitcoin.

Free speech goes both ways 🤷‍♂️

Surely these are parody

Yes. Who owns it, and what might decentralized ethnic networking have to do with it? is the rhetorical question.

That's free speech there. You may not like it, yet they can write it.

When they tell you who they are, believe them.

It matters not whether you are red or blue, democracy is the illusion both are clinging to in the US. Same in UK and Europe. Politics and media are owned. No point calling them out imo.

I agree. Captured.

🫡

The #Quash: The fundamental #fraud of the #Constitution Episode webpage: https://the-quash.captivate.fm/episode/the-fundamental-fraud-of-the-constitution Media file: https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/e7b630e9-11e7-4c5e-9fb6-f679e690f1b7/S4-Ep71AD-Thats-unconstitutional-converted.mp3 #1A #2A #9A...

The RNC and DNC are their two biggest advertisers. Especially election years. They get plenty of editorial because of it. Media might be left but they need to accommodate both parties

They are obsessed with trump though😝 https://m.primal.net/KaGE.png

I started noticing slanted journalism from them about five years ago. They just hang their preferences and slants out the window now. I don't trust them at all. It used to be a trustworthy organization with balanced articles. Maybe I'm remembering further back when the news was still the news.

🎯

The founding fathers are turning in their graves.