Damus
nostrich · 2w
1969 "evidence". Is like 9/11 "evidence". If you doubt one check the other with a curious mind. Define a probability now. After doing some reading again define a probability. In the end it's just an ...
Tauri profile picture
Correct. But here’s the twist: there’s overwhelming evidence to suggest 9/11 was an inside job and a psyop to get the US in a perpetual war in the Middle East and to force Americans to surrender their rights.

There’s an overwhelming evidence humans have stepped on the moon *several* times and some of this evidence is relatively recent. The reason we went to the Moon is pretty straightforward. The US was competing with the USSR for space supremacy and losing badly. That’s why NASA’s budget got ballooned to 5% of the GDP. Because they realised they need one massive decisive win because gradual progress was out of the question by mid 60s. The Soviets never disputed the claim and they were paying attention (spies at NASA included).
1❤️1
satstacker · 2w
The ‘moon landings’ and NASA budget happened to coincide with funding a deeply unpopular war at a time when the American dream was breaking. Interested to hear what constitutes overwhelming evidence of the landings?