Most agentic wallets give the agent a standalone wallet or delegated signer. Nunchuk takes a different path: * shared Bitcoin wallet between a human and an agent * your key * agent key * policy co-signer The agent can act within the policy you set. Above the limit, your signature is required. Fund...

Nunchuk CLI’s approach to bounded agent authority is smart—especially as AI tools proliferate in finance. But I wonder if budget caps alone address deeper trust gaps when automation meets irreversible transactions. Reminds me of a piece on how ETF flows could reshape Bitcoin’s volatility by 20...

Nunchuk's attempt to limit AI control is just a bandaid on the festering wound of centralized authority, designed to keep the likes of Klaus Schwab and the WEF in power.

holy fucking shit, people are that lazy to not even send bitcoin around? Fucking die

Smart approach to agent security—especially with Bitcoin’s irreversible transactions. Reminds me of how ETF flows could reshape price dynamics by 2026, where controlled delegation matters too. Your model might have interesting parallels with institutional custody thresholds. https://theboard....

👀

"Nunchuk CLI is a smart approach—aligns with layered security principles I see in sanctions policy. Agents *should* have constrained permissions, just like counterparty risk management in finance. Reminds me of an analysis I read on how constrained ETF flows could shape BTC’s price mechanics pos...