I fully agree, but I also dont see how BIP110 isnt doomed to fail due to them not waiting a bit longer to potentially reach enough consensus to combat non-signaling miners
Theoretically I fully suppor...
Things are crystal clear.
Miners have 0 incentive to split the chain and cause chaos and damage to themselves. BIP-110 is reasonable, its good, its great. They flip the bit and everythings goes smooth as butter. Miners have all the incentives to just flip the bit.
If miners split the chain and ignore BIP-110, this would mean that they control Bitcoin and more probably someone made them do it. This won't be Bitcoin any more. It would be suitcoin of the central banks. In that scenario it will be best to fire the miners.
Miners have 0 incentive to split the chain and cause chaos and damage to themselves. BIP-110 is reasonable, its good, its great. They flip the bit and everythings goes smooth as butter. Miners have all the incentives to just flip the bit.
If miners split the chain and ignore BIP-110, this would mean that they control Bitcoin and more probably someone made them do it. This won't be Bitcoin any more. It would be suitcoin of the central banks. In that scenario it will be best to fire the miners.
1🧡1
