nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqnujeyeqxq2kwwhtasx8tvl3mqvkx2nx9pads4qy7h6hqnrltukes4wg8xx Indeed, I was in that issue earlier today using it as a cudgel in a, um, er, *chat*.
@nprofile1q... still wish the more fundamental normative change to the definition of status message and 4.1.3's normative wording could have been pushed through https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4952 ... but there's "certain people" that seem hell-bent on not allowing any sort of fundamental change like that. maybe in a potential #WCAG 2.3...who knows
1