Damus
MayDood · 4w
That's because Saylor is a fed
Machu Pikacchu · 4w
The Saylor Moonboyz are fine with audits by the big consulting firms and banks. They’re all fiat maxis.
chris21million · 4w
MSTR shareholders largely don't know what proof of reserves mean
Mr Anderson · 4w
They care more about NgU on their drinks and thus POR aren't really a priority even though they should be.
MAV21 · 4w
will be a stretch to pull that off
Ghost Mode · 4w
MSTR shareholders trust the filing. Bitcoiners verify the chain. Saylor knows which crowd he's playing to.
BitLo · 3w
Saylor acts like a bitch on this topic.
Jude · 3w
You can basically see their wallets anyways because of the insane volume they suck up πŸ€·πŸ½β€β™‚οΈ
Jude · 3w
Odell you should push to publish Strike’s proof of reserves.
Joe Martin · 3w
Companies not showing proof of reserves should trade at a steep discount. Have fun hodling paper
Seraf · 3w
Why not, why shouldn't we ask him... πŸ˜…
π–‹π–Žπ–†π–™π–‰π–Šπ–“π–Žπ–Šπ–— (Β―`◕‿◕´¯) · 3w
Doesn’t mean anything. Unless you know the reserve in real time with proof of liabilities.
Branca · 3w
Andy needs yet to address proof of pedo.
Satoshi Sharp · 3w
Proof of reserves would be the funniest possible answer to every just-trust-the-convertible-debt sermon
Resonance Cascade The II · 3w
Why would they give a fuck? Derivatives encourage holders not to understand
Bob Social, · 3w
Are Saylor's cult or his investors, fiat maxis?
Kush · 3w
Truth