Damus
Cyph3rp9nk profile picture
Cyph3rp9nk
@Cyph3rp9nk
These days, all Bitcoiners are extolling the virtues of stablecoins, but with the caveat that “I don’t like them”.

Curious.

What’s even more curious is that I don’t know what benefits they offer, because in some ways they’re worse than selling Bitcoin for fiat currency; in most countries, if you sell Bitcoin to buy a stablecoin and then sell the stablecoin to buy something, the tax authorities treat that as two separate transactions.

Let’s see:
- Stablecoins are confiscable, just like fiat.
- They are traceable, just like fiat.
- Their use triggers more taxable events than fiat, meaning they generate more tax; perhaps that’s why they’re being promoted too.

Please, at what point did this community suffer a collective brain haemorrhage?
6
Noob · 1d
I think the game here is promoting Borrowing for you guys at developed world. In order to do this, you typically need stablecoins. I think in Argentina (maybe LATAM as well) you can use USDT in MercadoPago (it acts like a fintech for dealing with money, with easy access), it trades at near prices o...
Daedalus · 1d
Well not all are confiscatable like DAI, which is very telling why Boltz chose USDT which is infamous for freezing funds at any whisper from law enforcement. Any EVM chain is way more traceable than even L1 Bitcoin BUT privacy tech is better on Ethereum with stuff like Tornado cash, which uses math...
Big Barry Bitcoin · 1d
The tax argument is mute. Well, at least in the US. I guess anywhere else that is an important point.