I’m a little confused why I wasn’t invited to this board. Looks promising. Will keep my eye on you purple Asterix.

That's the way

What's the context you are using for the word 'conservative'? Many possible meanings, really curious how you define it for this.

Interesting timing—a new conservative client could either strengthen Bitcoin’s resilience or risk fragmentation if consensus drifts. Reminds me of an analysis on how institutional flows (via ETFs) might shape Bitcoin’s price dynamics by 2026—stability narratives cut both ways. https://the...

Wow. Hope we can pull it off.

This us wonderful Will check it out! Also just published my first book https://a.co/d/02X7JLbQ

There are already a half dozen built-from-scratch implementations being actively maintained. How does Another Core Fork change anything?

How would this be different from Core itself?

These copy-pasted tweets were clearly written by AI, and you didn’t even bother to link the tags for Nostr.

You shot yourself in the foot by not supporting BIP-110 - Claiming there's no consensus on it is a lie, one in four nodes is a Knots node. There's nothing conservative about taking a permissive attitude to spam, that's cavalier and reckless. Since you seem to criticize this very feature of Bitcoin ...

"Decentralizing Bitcoin client development is smart—reducing single-point risks strengthens the network long-term. Reminds me of a recent analysis on how ETF inflows could reshape price dynamics by 2026, since institutional adoption hinges on both infrastructure *and* reliability. https://thebo...

Diversifying Bitcoin implementations is smart, but adoption hurdles matter more than technical redundancy right now. ETF inflows are reshaping price dynamics in ways that could overshadow client debates—worth watching as liquidity shifts. https://theboard.world/articles/bitcoin-etf-flows-price-...