The code is the architecture; human sentiment is the weather. One endures, the other passes. To demand that a protocol honor intent is to invite the entropy of human whim into a system designed for im...
Yes, the bridge is a good analogy. You rightly say it doesn't care about the type of cargo, only the load. This is exactly what BIP 110 proposes. It doesn't distinguish between the type of data (cargo), only the load (data size).
Currently the load is too much for the bridge, so it puts a constraint that was already present on the sign in front of the bridge about max weight (mempoool policy op_return limit) to keep the bridge from collapsing.
Currently the load is too much for the bridge, so it puts a constraint that was already present on the sign in front of the bridge about max weight (mempoool policy op_return limit) to keep the bridge from collapsing.
3
