Damus
ODELL profile picture
ODELL
@ODELL
would adding confidential transactions to bitcoin mitigate spam?
55โค๏ธ15๐Ÿ‘€2๐Ÿค”2๐Ÿค™2๐Ÿ‘Ž1๐Ÿ’ก1
raffi · 33w
As a default! Try to filter that
Turiz · 33w
if it's confidential we won't even know whether it was spam transaction or financial transaction ? ๐Ÿคท๐Ÿพโ€โ™‚๏ธ whdo at you think?
Tony Acid · 33w
too much overhead - risking decentralization
kidwarp · 33w
Mimble wimble time finally?
Toby McMann · 33w
Spammers gonna spam.
Osiris · 33w
Bitchat??
j · 33w
only because there'd be no blockspace left ๐Ÿ˜…
Carman · 33w
Would make txs much bigger
Branca · 33w
Stop funding infiltrated core developers.
Mel · 33w
Seems like it
Moneta Pro Populo · 33w
I don't see an issue. https://relay.monetapro.xyz/fc8437c2df5285e2287a98a142f1681b5c4dc5701c4947f272b3b1ab01f28087.jpg
zBTCowany BIP110 · 33w
First fix the taproot hack. Start removing garbage from bitcoin first, then we can think about adding stuff to it.
CptKook · 33w
Is the potential impact of spam increasing the likelihood of a hard fork?
Erik · 33w
It would kill the ordinals theory, but data stuffing is still possible
Benking · 33w
They might indirectly limit spam by making txs bigger and heavier, but fees are still the real deterrent.
nostrich · 33w
nostr:nevent1qqsxvm90nev34uzkjqxwuee2hk43nxaxfvyfv5lhqkned6wtm0acenqppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhx27rfwsh8qatz9uw7h9c8
Btcwrestle · 33w
CT would be awesome. Not sure if it mitigates spam tho.
9/11receipts · 33w
nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpyq49dlcmlaul3rz7hqz7y30wt3m4evvevzegvfk0cneqgzw2aqpqyt8wumn8ghj76rfwd6zumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qqs0x6hee4qulk0qkt3vaenxlsy46aehey6stcf874yjs4xn7frxk2g9tc0vz
Petronius Tchaikovsky · 32w
Longtime question from regular freak - what's the best way to ensure UTXO privacy, coinjoin? Send to lightening that back on chain?