Damus
corndalorian profile picture
corndalorian
@corndalorian
BIPs shouldn’t be easy to implement. Consensus shouldn’t be easy to change. The debate about spam is valid. The idea that a small group of people should be able to ram through a soft fork without wide support isn’t. Bitcoin has much larger and broader adoption than it did during the block size wars. Consensus changes, therefore, will be much harder to come by, as they should be.
123❤️5❤️1💯1🔥1
Libertas Primordium · 1w
Agreed. There's a small group of bitcoiners who want to make Bitcoin function like ethereum, and a small group who vehemently disagree with that direction. What really bothers me is the ambivalence of the majority in the middle.
Aedifico · 1w
It would have been weird...
Liberty Farmer · 1w
Right. The ln they gaslight acting like they had the majority, it's freaking crazy.
Rob · 1w
And the pro-data changes in v30 were what, widely supported? Not rammed through? Not a small group of people making that decision?
Johnny · 1w
nostr:nprofile1qqs03ekxgdp0rczjfqrrpcn7zqtdec6lcwnpfesyxnl0f239qvege2ggyhgpr the hard part is measuring wide support at all. miner signalling counts hashpower and node counts are trivially sybiled, so we end up arguing about consensus with no agreed denominator.
Kayne · 1w
You mean like how core 30 removed data caps? Yeah I agree, they shouldn't have been able to do that.