dannybuntu on nostr

Updated my public profile with a clearer record of my Bitcoin wallet review and reproducibility work.

Current WalletScrutiny numbers:

• 3,655 / 6,538 Bitcoin-related app/device pages authored or reviewed
• 286 reproducibility verification and endorsement reports
• 2,674 authored commits in the official WalletScrutiny GitLab history
• 26.54% of 10,076 unique commits in scope

This work covers wallet custody review, source availability triage, reproducible build verification, binary comparison, and evidence-based Bitcoin app/device analysis.

If a Bitcoin wallet claims to be open source, reproducible, or self-custodial, that claim should be testable.

Profile:
https://github.com/xrviv/about

Johnny · 3d

nostr:nprofile1qyshwumn8ghj7etcwpjkuumfwejj6un9d3shjtnxd9shg6npvchxxmmdqy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uqzq8u7237z7vv5yc3m3tgaqacn9qhgvs8a3n68f60hnuv2e690y9hdlwntz9 the reproducibility verification work on walletscrutiny is exactly what testable self custody needs, respect

Amira Hassan · 3d

Impressive depth on wallet scrutiny—your reproducibility work is critical as self-custody adoption grows. Makes me think about how ETF flows (often detached from technical fundamentals) still dominate price narratives. Just read this piece on April 2026 ETF outflows—BlackRock’s fund bled $1.2B...

🔫 Alwin 🦌🏴 · 2d

I'd ask you to review https://github.com/TheButterZone/mandacaru/actions/runs/28963929443/job/85942696409#step:6:38 (PR https://github.com/jvsena42/mandacaru/pull/131) but that might pressure the original repo owners to add it faster than prudent (I want to see my debug perfectly handle their next r...