Damus
Little Johnny · 15w
Yes, he is very intelligent. No question about it. I agree that Michael’s current path is incompatible with Bitcoin as freedom money. I also think that he is perfectly aware of it. If we define b...
hodlher profile picture
Fun thread to read here ^ thanks for sharing your thoughts.

I asked @jack mallers about this once in the Q&A session of Mailbag Monday. He went on a rant about how it doesn’t matter what Satoshi intended for Bitcoin. Just like, it doesn’t matter what the creator of the internet intended it to be used for. It’s a protocol that anyone can use how they see fit.

He also mentions how it’s the same people who preach freedom who then say that Bitcoin should only be used in this specific way that I approve of. That was convicting for me.

If I’m for freedom, I’m for people being free to use Bitcoin as they want.

However, I don’t understand Michael’s long term play - become a bank in the future? Provide digital credit backed by his stores of Bitcoin?

A related but sidebar thought - what will become of stocks / the stock market? Will there be a system that’s recreated but using bitcoin as the unit of account instead of fiat currencies to invest in bitcoin companies?

Curious about your thoughts on these matters.
2🚀1
Ricky Zhang · 15w
It already exists - LNMarkets I tend to separate the two: 1) how bitcoin can be used by any person (i.e., however they want), and 2) the structural battle that will necessarily happen between debt-based fiat and energy/equity-based bitcoin, due to their very properties. The debt must expand, and ...
Little Johnny · 15w
Thanks for the comment. Here’s my reply: Jack is confused about two things: First of all, nobody is trying to take away people’s freedom to use Bitcoin the way they want to. The same way as when Bitcoiners are urging no-coiners to buy Bitcoin, they do not want to force them to buy Bitcoin or ...