Damus
Toxic Bitcoiner profile picture
Toxic Bitcoiner
@toxicbitcoiner
If someone could explain, with details, the claim that BIP110 gives Luke control, that would help many people make a more informed decision.
144โค๏ธ3โค๏ธ2๐Ÿ‘€1๐Ÿ’š1๐Ÿค™1
n0>1 signals bip110 · 1d
Good luck
Sourcenode · 1d
I spent the last few weeks looking into this as deeply as possible. What I concluded is that this is a political power struggle much more than a technical fix. It has to do with what we believe bitcoin to be, but it also has to do with how it is upgraded and governed. The BIP110 camp knows that th...
Weatherall · 1d
this is apparently a hard ask... #fuckcore #runknots
Little Johnny · 1d
I think that npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx said that it would, but I might remember wrong. I think it's a good idea to tag the people who have said that BIP110 gives Luke control so that they can explain what they mean. If they so choose to.
DireMunchkin · 1d
It doesn't: Merely writing a full node client or a fork doesn't give anybody control over anything. People need to voluntarily download and run the code in order for it to matter. If BIP-110 succeeds that would not indicate Ocean mining or whoever hijacked Bitcoin, but that their vision of what Bit...
moonsettler · 8h
i think the original claim was "bip-110 is about firing core". and then who will take their place?