Damus
Kevin's BLAKE2bacon · 80w
No real meaning to you, I assert, but meaning to some others. Perhaps you simply fail to understand the meaning of the concept in other people's minds, in addition to finding it contradictory to your ...
nostrich profile picture
No, I don’t think that the word “god” has any definable meaning in terms of objective physical reality.

But let me ask, if you think that a “god” exists, can you name any possible evidence which would falsify that belief for you?

My suspicion is that this is a non-falisfiable belief, as it is for most people, and so there is no such identifiable evidence. Most people say you just have to “have faith” in such things.
Pawn Dev · 80w
The problem is that you are using the physical method to study a metaphysical concept. Physics and metaphysics are two different sciences with two different methods. Since metaphysics is poorly understood, people tend to think of it as a free for all, specially because modern philosophy started to t...
Kevin's BLAKE2bacon · 80w
I might as well say you just "have faith" in your axioms and leave it at that, but that would not be a good faith engagement with your framework of metaphysics and how you arrived at it. You are also, if I'm not mistaken, using the Empiricist's Fallacy just like I pointed out. I thought you were an...