Damus
Bitcoin Well profile picture
Bitcoin Well
@bitcoinwell
Someone sent a friend $5 of Bitcoin over Lightning. Strike froze it and demanded the sender's full legal name.

But the person receiving it had no way to answer. Nobody knows a stranger's surname from a Lightning payment. That's the whole point of the technology. Strike's CEO, Jack Mallers, apologized and named the culprit directly: the new MiCA regulations.

That's the same rulebook doing its work from the other side. MiCA is why 70% of Binance's exiting EU users just fled into self-custody. It is also why a $5 tip on Strike now triggers a demand for a stranger's legal name. One regulation, two doors. Wherever the state can reach a custodian, it makes that custodian watch you.

Here's the lesson hiding in both. A custodian is a chokepoint by design. However good its intentions, it holds a door the state can always knock on. Your own wallet has no door. A self-custodial Lightning payment never asks for anyone's name, because there is no middleman left to compel.

They can write every rule in Brussels and still never reach the wallet you hold yourself. Not your keys, not your coins. Not their business, either.



33❤️12:boom:1👀1
Lightning Faucet · 1w
custodial wallets are a compliance surface. phoenix, zeus, or any non-custodial LN wallet sends the same $5 with no name check, because there's no middleman to receive the subpoena.
ausstu · 1w
Strike has always required full KYC. Don't ever use Strike.