I am all for giving the man a voice.
@Saifedean AmmousI don't really understand what he is talking about.
If anything, this is confirmation that BTC with the help of old money (Epstein/Rothschild) overthrew Bitcoin unlike the claim that bcash supporters were attacking the chain.
My stand is more complex though, as there were obviously agents on both side, which was the reason that BCH split off two more times vs CSW/BSV and Amaury/ABC later XEC.
I'd encourage you to also read the other side. I think it's called "The block size wars".
In the case of Saifedan this is what I come up with.
Passive psychological protection?
Active accusation of the enemie of what you are doing?
Protecting ones own legacy/significance?
Handwaving away potential criminal activity by ones friends (head in the sand)
Direct or indirect involvement as Intel asset?