https://blossom.primal.net/76ce916289ba89fc23835db8db70e705739af16b42392b41d45ab6a3f5cbbcd9.gif

This is 100% exactly what our ENEMIES wanted from this nonsense quantum shit!! They WANT to use this as an excuse to destroy it!!

Such a retarded approach

Sos loco, Bitcoin no se salva destruyéndolo, si no cuidamos lo que tenemos no tenemos nada.

That guy has a messed up approach to most things.

Id rather my bitcoin be stolen from a quantumn computer than it be rugged from a failed hard fork which this proposal will likely cause if its ever implemented .

Nope. I don’t think so

What he suggested maybe half a step less stupid or unethical than thisnone in my opinion “I had a better idea let’s distribute to all that money to the people in need.” Am I the only one to think that is against Bitcoin ethos to decide to open the road for freezing assets 🤔

The fact that these devs think this is a good idea means it's time for new devs.

And another reason not to like Lameson Flopp.

Does removing the temptation do anything to tamp out the massive greed and energy expenditure? That may be a more interesting question

Errrrrr No !

Why?! I’m happy to be on the left side of the bell curve for this one.

I mean, we’re not going to adopt this but maybe the game theory behind it is that IF and only if a quantum computer exists, they are not going to steal any coins using quantum because there is a possibility that the community implements this as a reaction to the threat

zap received. means something.

Not a great plan.

My two sats. https://youtu.be/o-Q9JWHcQOI

"Hi we're here to seize your gold because someone might steal it from you in the future"

i love bitcoin support my proposal that destroys bitcoin

Hear me out: If quantum ever Gers serious don't freeze coins in legacy addresses, but disable sending coins from legacy to quantum resistant addresses. This way OG hodlers retain "control" over their coins in the same way the had, when they first received them to their wallet. And quantum hackers ha...

This is the most Jameson Lopp thing of all time

seems he worried about price affect more than cultural philosophical principles implications as "uncensorable..." here is Mr Lopp proposing "censoring" as what else is it?