Damus
Allen · 17w
Actually kinda makes sense to me.
Ronin · 17w
what is ridiculous? he's right. you can't do any use case in bitcoin, that's why there are soft and hard forks. it's permissionless about people because you don't have to ask permission to any one to use it.
Tauri · 17w
nostr:nevent1qqs0xxmewuqpk0exqepetttfwmeexk5g4nelqm0tmjkv6k0juam5w5czg2dmd
nobody · 17w
You confuse permissionless money with permissionless file hosting. Bitcoin validates monetary transactions - not arbitrary data storage. Your "permissionless" rhetoric serves as blinkers, obscuring the reality that without filters, every node operator becomes an unwilling host for permanent file st...
Neal BIP110 · 17w
censoring content and protocol validity have two different objects. https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqspxgc6unxajuj2ww4kqhn8pya8t0tf2s0409yy002cxxu2s5xdwyqu7pyf2
Toxic Bitcoiner · 17w
Reading comprehension failure.
jgbtc · 17w
Luke is 100% correct. Bitcoin is permissionless *money*. For permissionless other stuff you'll need to find another blockchain. You should check out Ethereum. It aligns perfectly with your "everything is a valid use case" mindset.
Samee · 16w
Permissionless money not permissionless arbitrary data storage network.