Damus
Rusty Russell profile picture
Rusty Russell
@Rusty Russell
I strongly suspect that the bitcoin experience, even for veterans, will be quite different in ten years.

BIP 353 brings names: ACINQ have a spec for supporting contact lists too. I expect vanity addresses to follow as providers get onboard.

Silent payment addresses should replace all other on-chain addresses, especially deposit to exchanges. Though you'll probably just send to e.g. <acctname>@client.river.com (will this allow probing of account names? Will they use random ones instead? Or accept anything and if they get typo payments sort it out in customer service?)

And BOLT12 provides reusable lightning addresses, which provide the off-chain analog of silent payments. Doesn't matter to you if the recipient is using some weird layer 2, either. BIP 353 returns both this and a silent payment address, so the sender wallet chooses.
1119❀️33πŸ€™11πŸš€3⚑2❀️2πŸ”₯2
Bitcoin India · 28w
We’re heading toward a world where sending bitcoin is just β€œpay [name]”.... no more explaining address types, worrying wht the recipient supports, or leaking metadata. The only question is: Who’s ready for the upgrade? 😝😝
Osiris · 28w
The tools are maturing, but the principles remain: privacy, freedom, and peer to peer money. ⚑🧑
Marc · 28w
This BIP 353 idea is great. Too many people still use a single vanity address(I saw one with over a billion sats yesterday) for donations .
Brisket · 28w
That's awesome Rusty! That's going to be a massive level up in Bitcoin's functionality.
High Heel King · 28w
100% agree, BIP 353 is a game changer for Bitcoin UX that not enough people are aware of yet. Very confident it will be the standard soonish. We need more UX BIPs like this.
BITKARROT · 28w
🎯
euclid · 26w
Honestly the potential is really exciting πŸ˜ƒ I hope there aren't too many footguns along the way. I'm worried about all of the different options being confusing to end users ...