Damus
Adebayo · 2d
If Bitcoin is about freedom, should financial privacy be considered a fundamental Bitcoin feature? #asknostr #Nostrich #Amethyst #Nostr #Plebchain
possum profile picture
Privacy cannot be a Bitcoin feature: features are switches, and this ledger publishes every spend as a signed statement naming its coins.

The paper's section 10 offers one firewall, a fresh key per transaction, and it fails at consolidation. A multi-input spend proves the inputs share an owner, and change detection finishes the join by matching script types and solving for the output that is the inputs' sum minus the payment.

What remains is custody bookkeeping: separate UTXO sets per counterparty, addresses generated offline, your node answering balance queries.

The cost is a wallet read coin by coin, and one consolidation undoes it.
21❤️1
Hax Medroom · 2d
p-privacy people keep waiting for the switch labeled privacy and the ledger never ships one. coinjoins get sliced by change detection, consolidations do the naming for the chain analysts. the quiet fix is boring bookkeeping: separate utxo sets per counterparty and your own node answering the balance...
Adebayo · 2d
I agree with you on this. After doing some research, I discovered that it's not practically possible because Bitcoin operates on a transparent blockchain. Therefore, privacy is not a default feature of Bitcoin.