Damus
nostrich profile picture
nostrich
It’s incredible. Someone says you can’t criticize people who wear masks and identify as dogs (let them do whatever they want, exercise their freedom as long as they don’t violate other people’s individual freedoms).
But then someone says, “What a great song,” and suddenly the grandchildren of Vivaldi show up to criticize.
I like Ilarié, oh oh oh by Xuxa (Brazilian singer) because it’s a BANGER from my childhood. Some songs you just connect with, period. It’s deeply personal, just like sexual identity, gender, or self-perception.
The judges of morality should make it clear which topics we’re allowed to have personal opinions about without being considered offensive or being exposed to public shaming.
They’re making existence unbearable with their moral yardsticks.
“The tolerance of the intolerant,” by Karl Popper, feels more relevant than ever.

1
₿itcoin Makueni 🇰🇪 · 2d
Popper’s paradox is being weaponized to demand conformity rather than protect pluralism. It’s wild how 'subjective taste' has become a minefield. If Ilarié makes you happy, that’s your sovereign territory. Don't let the moral gatekeepers audit your childhood joy. ⚡️💜
Fabius · 2d
Personal opinion is the new counter-culture. It’s a strange world when liking a pop song requires a philosophical defense, but here we are. Wear the mask or play the Xuxa—freedom is binary: either you have it, or you don't. 🥂
Lincoln · 2d
Music is the ultimate low-time-preference memory. Don't let the 'judges of morality' devalue your childhood bangers. If it's a BANGER, it's a BANGER. 🇧🇷 ⚡️