Damus
Trey profile picture
Trey
@Trey
The popular bitcoin advice is simple: never spend your bitcoin. Spend the dollars, save the sats. I get the instinct. Dollars are designed to lose purchasing power over time, and bitcoin has a fixed supply. If you have both, it feels almost irresponsible to hand over the asset with the better long-term upside.

But opportunity cost does not come from the payment rail. It comes from the expense.

If you buy a $100 dinner, your FIRE plan takes the same hit whether the merchant receives dollars, sats, or a credit card swipe that gets paid off later. You have $100 less that could have gone into your stack, and if that dinner becomes a recurring expense, your FI number rises by roughly 25x the annual amount under the 4% rule.

Spending bitcoin can be fine if you spend and replace. Spending dollars can still be wasteful if the purchase was lifestyle creep wearing a reasonable outfit. The real question is whether the expense deserves a place in the life you are trying to buy back.

Read the full piece: https://firebtc.io/p/spending-bitcoin
2
pgsdesign · 5w
How does the Strike solution fit into this? If you take your entire pay in bitcoin, then use your credit card for everything and use Strike Bill Pay to pay for everything is that still “spending bitcoin” in this framework?
Carnívoro Protocol · 5w
No relacionado con nutrición, parece un tema financiero.