Seth For Privacy on nostr

Open in Damus

Seth For Privacy

@Seth For Privacy 1701355928

No clue how @OCEAN can sell itself on a platform of "transparency" and "bringing censorship-resistance back to Bitcoin" when this is how they approach things.

Can't think of a more disappointing Bitcoin launch in recent memory. Maybe community pushback will make them rethink their approach, but I can't sit by and watch this unfold without calling out this BS.

199❤️12🤙10👀2🚀2🍻1👊1

I don't know if it's bacause that website uses cloudflare proxy and didn't allow Tor users without the captcha, or because of the format, bit my Amethist doesn't open any of your images :/

sathoarder · 120w

While I totally understand your argument and agree that filtering OP_FALSE is indeed censorship, aren't all miners censoring to some degree? When a miner includes their own transactions at 0 sat/vb in a block aren't they censoring someone else who paid a fee? Inscriptions will still be picked up b...

Look at the players involved. I’m more surprised anyone would be surprised.

MrShroom🍄 · 120w

Seems like very few care. Memes about water are more important right now.

Cyber Seagull · 120w

This is a power move.

Cyber Seagull · 120w

Calling Miner extracted value "off-band payments" is a linguistic attack. They have just admitted that their major argument against Drivechain and Bip300/1 is already a native aspect of bitcoin, they want to chamge miner incentives, but not admit their hypocrasy and preference for their own projec...

nostr:npub1s33sw6y2p8kpz2t8avz5feu2n6yvfr6swykrnm2frletd7spnt5qew252p haven’t seen your video today yet, but would love to see a 2nd video on Ocean pool going through these concerns. Seems to be very early and already censoring transactions

Captain's Nostr Log · 120w

It's BS, and we need to stop giving Jack a free pass