Damus
Juraj๐Ÿด๐Ÿ’›๐ŸŒ˜ · 5w
Thank you for correcting me on the openrouter fee and ppq discount, I will remember it from now on and it's very good that you are cheaper than openrouter, win for everyone! Still, we're way cheaper....
redshift profile picture
Yes! We're exploring a TLS based verification system so that the clients can verify that the model and the responses were not tampered with. https://github.com/tlsnotary/tlsn/

I'm currently exploring this. Unlike those solutions, we don't need an attestor at all. Because its a different usecase the client is the attestor and the verifier.
1
Juraj๐Ÿด๐Ÿ’›๐ŸŒ˜ · 5w
Ah, yes, this could work. The problem with TLSNotary in general is that because of symmetric key is used for both sides, you can't really tell apart if client or server sent something, but this could work. But you still need some form of masking (either whitelist or blacklist), if you want to prov...