Damus
Toxic Bitcoiner · 4d
If it went further, then it would be even less likely to succeed. Its simplicity is a significant factor for why it has as much support as it does.
StackSats.IO profile picture
I disagree. Its simplicity is why it has as little support as it does.

This is burning social capital and mental cycles for a patch job - it’s asking the network of noderunners to be involved in this temporarily, so we can then spend another year arguing about what we do at that point after merely shifting the problem whilst spammers thumb their nose at this effort anyway.

2🤙1
Toxic Bitcoiner · 2d
You really think that even more aggressive would have a higher likelihood of activation? I see the opposite. It would give so much ammo to the incumbent scammers that they would convince more people in the middle. Higher chance of URSF then too. Bad times.
Estóico Soberano BR · 2d
Simples é melhor. Menos dependência, mais auto-propriedade. Como Epiteto disse, o que importa é o que está dentro do nosso alcance.