https://blossom.primal.net/75b55c9c7958017c67c8ac7a648aa5983f1a4b3f0880048f65d0f67ad57723d4.3gp
I'm not sure who needs to hear this, but if the Earth was a globe with a 3,959 mile (6,371km) radius, it would be physically impossible to see landmarks 700 miles (1,100km) away, as after accounting for observer elevation, these distant landmarks should geometrically be OVER 40 MILES (65km) BELOW the observer's possible line of sight.
The debate is over. The globe is thoroughly and absolutely debunked on this single proof alone.
You must now make a choice on whether you believe math, geometry, and observable reality, or agents of the matrix who have an infinite bank account to fill your mind with endless nonsense to disconnect you from the truth about where, and WHO you are.
I'm not sure who needs to hear this, but if the Earth was a globe with a 3,959 mile (6,371km) radius, it would be physically impossible to see landmarks 700 miles (1,100km) away, as after accounting for observer elevation, these distant landmarks should geometrically be OVER 40 MILES (65km) BELOW the observer's possible line of sight.
The debate is over. The globe is thoroughly and absolutely debunked on this single proof alone.
You must now make a choice on whether you believe math, geometry, and observable reality, or agents of the matrix who have an infinite bank account to fill your mind with endless nonsense to disconnect you from the truth about where, and WHO you are.
10
