Damus
₿en Wehrman profile picture
₿en Wehrman
@benwehrman
https://blossom.primal.net/75b55c9c7958017c67c8ac7a648aa5983f1a4b3f0880048f65d0f67ad57723d4.3gp

I'm not sure who needs to hear this, but if the Earth was a globe with a 3,959 mile (6,371km) radius, it would be physically impossible to see landmarks 700 miles (1,100km) away, as after accounting for observer elevation, these distant landmarks should geometrically be OVER 40 MILES (65km) BELOW the observer's possible line of sight.

The debate is over. The globe is thoroughly and absolutely debunked on this single proof alone.

You must now make a choice on whether you believe math, geometry, and observable reality, or agents of the matrix who have an infinite bank account to fill your mind with endless nonsense to disconnect you from the truth about where, and WHO you are.
342❤️5💥1
Leviticus Mathew · 2w
UMMMM there is no line of sight to see things hundreds of miles away.
Clay Bertrand · 2w
Keine Sorge 😂 Ich weiß Bescheid! Ich bin bei der Deutschen Marine als ausgebildeter Navigator zur See gefahren. Ich weiß wie unser Planet aussieht. Ich habe ihn auch berechnet 😉
wymike · 2w
If the earth is flat then this photo should be repeatable. It wouldn’t take that much effort (considering we’ve put a mirror on the moon) to put a mirror on one of the peaks and bounce a laser of it to prove it’s actually the peak we’re seeing and not something else. Currently this 1 phot...
GJM · 2w
The image being discussed in the video that you are basing your argument on is in dispute and has never been authenticated by third party organisations or neutral data. It’s not proof of a flat earth.
BlueDuckBTC · 1w
Just curious what your response would be to this? Also, why would you not just plan a trip to the pole to see this for yourself? https://blossom.primal.net/ad067bcda1664cd414c165c3a892bbe72af4859ea303984d38ce852eb7f21743.jpg