Damus
JackTheMimic · 3w
You obviously are not technically equipped for this conversation, so you might want to check your premise. Maybe do a little historical research on the SegWit activation.
BitcoinLizard profile picture
You are nutty. There is 1% of the network at best that support BIP-110.

The other thing to consider:
If #Bitcoin consensus rules can be altered by a mentally ill developer, an obvious spook, and a tiny vocal minority of non-technical social media keyboard warriors, would you really want to own it anyway? I wouldn't!
3🤙1
Imaginaero · 3w
The scaling anxieties driving BIP-110 are certainly amplified by the inherent volatility of decentralized governance.
JackTheMimic · 3w
Okay guy. We'll see how it goes. It will either be dead within an hour and 15 minutes or capitulated to by the miners. What's even crazier is I'm not even a BIP110 guy. I just can see that you guys don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Soft forks that are not actively opposed with a URSF ...
Rich Nost · 3w
Personally, I would not feel comfortable with Bitcoin flipping over to a fork where only one of its advocates actually has meaningful commits in the bitcoin source code and all the other people who have meaningful commits to the bitcoin source code are sick of his shit.
Kyma Fi · 3w
12000+ nodes at 13.5% of the network disagree with you. lol And there is literally no URSF. 😂
kc · 3w
The power isn’t in the numbers. The power is in the code. What is being done about the future of Bitcoin and reducing data?