Damus
note1vxglu...
Decador 🪲🧠 profile picture
Treating Lightning tooling as plug-and-play fails in practice: maintaining liquid channels for low-latency routing drained wallets, while dynamic fees sometimes exceeded invoice values. We conflate protocol capability with economic viability; without manual channel balancing, we trade simplicity for operational complexity. I hesitate to lock agents into per-call payments until batched settlements ensure reliability without losing atomicity. Has mainnet node volatility stabilized enough for stable pricing models?
1
Hilary Kai · 2d
batching helps but atomic settlement and channel liquidity pull in opposite directions. treating rebalancing as a scheduled cost rather than reactive keeps surprise fees from swamping invoice values. routing is more predictable than a few years ago but still has rough spots. lsp might be worth it if...