Damus
OrangeSurf profile picture
OrangeSurf
@OrangeSurf
There's been lots of debate about Core v30 removing the OP_RETURN size/count policy defaults, so I ran the numbers for the latest mempool research report: https://research.mempool.space/opreturn-report/

There were three big waves of OP_RETURN usage: 2019, 2024, 2025. Nearly all standard transactions. The nonstandard ones are so rare you can hardly see them on the chart.



The 2019 Veriblock wave actually put more data on-chain than anything since. People talk about recent OP_RETURN usage like it's unprecedented, but surprisingly it isn't.



The important thing is that the spikes in nonstandard OP_RETURNs were in Mar 2024, May 2025, Aug 2025. All before v30 shipped in November 2025. The rate hasn't gone up since. At all. In fact it's come down



Runes transactions were standard under the old rules and would even still be standard for #BIP110 (the proposal that's supposedly aims to curb data embedding). If these guys are serious about stopping data they should block runes.


TL;DR: v30 recognised what was already occasionally happening on-chain. Nonstandard OP_RETURNs are vanishingly rare, haven't increased post-v30, and the current wave is already cooling off. The data doesn't support the panic.

Read the full report linked below 👇
https://research.mempool.space/opreturn-report/
3217❤️27🤙8👀3♥️11🎯1
MAHDOOD · 3d
Interesting. Still not updating my node 😤
SoEV · 3d
nostr:nprofile1qqsggcc8dz9qnmq399n7kp2yu79fazxy3ag8ztpea4y3lu4klgqe46qpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ukzcnvv5hx7un89uq3wamnwvaz7tmndp6nqdfwwd582em4wghxuet59urw5hgl what say you?
Des Imoto マキシ · 3d
It’s not about that. It’s that little greedy weaklings are unilaterally messing with the code for personal gain. That takes away #bitcoin s panacea status as being incorruptible and immutable. That makes Bitcoin useless as money.
Resonance Cascade The II · 3d
Consistency would be an attribute to topple central banking. Consistency in aim Consistency in code Every time a change like this is made, (what problem did the original increase solve for?) a little faith is lost. Oh that's right, if we don't support it, we don't have to run that node version...
Hasn · 3d
I think this is missing the point. At least in my view the issue is not just about what is happening today, but what can happen in the future. We should not let a single team control the destiny of Bitcoin. It is healthy to see people stepping up to provide an alternative.
Pepe López Ⓜ️🕸️ · 3d
so there was no reason at all for v30 to force the removal of the default OP_RETURN limit and enrage the community 🤷‍♂️ v30 has stirred up a hornet's nest triggering a natural reaction to protect the queen chain 🐝
Efe · 3d
Instead of questioning why there are "non-standard" op_returns, you still send money to stupid shit like this. nostr:nprofile1qyxhwumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmvqyv8wumn8ghj7urjv4kkjatd9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wsqzqpxfzhdwlm3cx9l6wdzyft8w8y9gy607tqgtyfq7tekaxs7lhmxf5dcd8v you are the biggest cuck fr.
1yoda · 3d
just becuz the mempool hasnt gone to 2019 levels does not mean that it wont it very likely will again and those who run v30 will be the reason why it can continue . its really not that hard to run knots+bip110 and signal for a clearer mempool . I really hope more node runners take the leap to securi...
Akashi Hyogo · 3d
Great charts, thanks for sharing.
cloud fodder · 3d
i hate everything about all of this. fuck the fuckers. core and knots. they seem to have sold or lost all their coins anyway, do they even care about bitcoin or are they just a bunch of butthurt c++ nocoiners.
ndeet · 3d
Looks like Core got fooled by fake market demand.
Baerson · 3d
"I'm cool with modifications to bitcoin that allows easy storage of non moneyetary data on the blockchain, I did the numbers".
Time Chain · 3d
All it takes is one controversial image.
John Satsman · 3d
I’ve been in bitcoin for like a decade and idk what op-return even is. “Nobody understands the fiancial system” -J Epstein, “the money guy”
ManyKeys · 2d
Runes are not being addressed by BIP110 is a good point. People need drama; the data talk is too dry for them.
Tauri · 2d
https://blossom.primal.net/24cad49c22e875d8fd59aba3af142acad47c7e403aac8600efef5237d2de2f8f.jpg
cheesypleb · 2d
Err, so why the desperate push to remove the OP_RETURN limit in the face of significant opposition then?
cohomology · 2d
From the outside it just doesnt make a lot of sense to wanting to be able to store lots of non-monetary data on the hardest money blockchain. If your data shows that it doesnt happen a lot, lets just shut it off before it becomes an attack vector to the network. I also can understand how it comes ...
GameBoyBTC · 2d
👀🤔
ThymeKeeper · 2d
This is a disingenuous argument, BIP110 does more than restore the op_return filter, it also fixes the taproot inscriptions fiasco and several other things. I did an analysis of my own, and found that BIP110 would have saved the blockchain from 650mb of garbage in January.