yes but also the cool part of bitcoin is they dont have to be

youre certainly doing plenty of dividing yourself

you guys have to make up your mind on whether i am in charge of an elaborate conspiracy against bitcoin or “i do nothing”

but it can’t be both

this post is a response to others attacking me first

i will not back down to assholes, asshole

core centralization is a concern and is being improved without a consensus change

spammers can get around bip 110 restrictions and it sets a precedent for utxo seizures, the "temporary" aspect is a fucking scam because it just means you will have to do it again in a year, or admit it was all a waste of time in the first place, it is a soft fork being pushed without anywhere close to consensus, so it will either result in a chain split or die due to apathy

takes time, money, and manpower

but a bunch of us are working on distributing protocol dev and increasing options

nope and you are being a hypocrite here

how so

trying my best, open to improvement

gradually then suddenly

we have not

he has no control of opensats

and i remain grateful for his donation, it has been a grind getting sizeable donations

i run core 29

there is a lot of work being done on libbitcoinkernel which should make it much easier to offer consensus valid alternative implementations

more choices for node operators is strictly better, opensats is focused on this

well said