Occasionally, when I visit people, I am exposed to the BBC Evening News. A couple of weeks ago, the BBC told me that the lovely hot, sunny weather I was enjoying was caused by "human-induced climate change." Can anybody tell me if the BBC is currently reporting that the cold, wet miserable weather I am presently fed up with is also caused by "human-induced climate change?"

I am so sick of the idiotically transparent attempted deviousness of the British government when it comes to forcing people into using biometric digital identity. Those of us who know what it is will never willingly adopt it. No amount of flimflam is going to suddenly take us by surprise. We're going to resist. End of!

Those people who don't know what it is and don't realise what they are walking into don't need to be convinced with clever, or not so clever, tricks and diversions. Just tell them they can get a a better deal on car insurance, even if it's not true, by using their biometric digital identity and they'll be queuing down the street to get hold of it.

There is no need to maintain the charade that it has anything to do with "keeping children safe." It's obviously about enslavement and control so just give it a rest. The propaganda is totally unecessary.

https://off-guardian.org/2026/06/08/device-level-nudity-detection-uk-govt-blackmailing-public-into-digital-id/

I came in for a fair bit of criticism towards the end of this video from @nprofile1q... and journalist Vanessa Beeley, who is a freelance reporter for @UK Column among others. I don't accept that criticism but that's not important.

What matters is that contrary to Vanessa Beeley's thoughts on the matter, there is much more that unites our perspective than divides it. I have reached out to Vanessa and hope she will accept my invitation to discuss what she calls the "central enemy complex."

I hope you find this discussion as interesting and informative as I did.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KujYnSA2IBE

I have stirred the "independent media" hornet's nest in the UK with my article "The UK Column Conundrum." The very personal responses and accusations have been quite amazing and, ironically, precisely the kind of thing I was trying to steer away from with the article. Clearly, some feathers are very ruffled. Which hardly reduces the level of suspicion I have to say.

https://iaindavis.substack.com/p/the-uk-column-conundrum

Is it ironic, even hilarious perhaps, to now watch globalist shills like Tony Bliar backtracking on the climate scam now they realise they can't power their data centres with windmills and sunshine.

It is certainly irksome, after years of being called a "climate denier," to hear leading climate change alarmists, like Bliar, use many of the same arguments put by those of us he personally vilified as "climate deniers" while simultaneously saying "it's not that I am a climate denier."

No, none of us ever were mate. That was your propaganda construct.

But if those of us who pointed out what a farce the climate scam was were labelled "climate deniers" by you and your tech mogul paymasters, no way are you going to weasel out of having some reciprocal labels stuck on you.

I could think of some choice ones, but how about "born again climate denier"?

Suggestions in the comments please.