:)

it’s about not questioning the state and cheering what they tell you.
but seems you passionately like their propaganda.

+1 +1 on this!!


and I think similar things can be said about taking out any leader in the world. People will cheer for Trump being taken out and there will be people who will be better of. Same for any EU country...there will be people cheering and being better of.
generally I think it's a colonial mindset to think this only applies to countries like Venezuela (with which was meddled for way more than a decade.)

Especially the typical critical people need to stay with their principles and question things. "don't trust, verify" and such..

No, but I hope we see those double standards. and I am sad that people who normally claim never trust the state are now blindly cheering the state to force others.

great, happy for you.

(my post here also was is about if it is good/bad. but the lack of questioning and the sudden support for a state from people who always claim to reject the state. People who don't want to be forced by the state now cheer that the state forces others to something)

yes,
I just try to say that this is imo the exact propaganda and distraction that makes it work and they want one to believe in.
For sure some people will be benefit from new rulers, just as some people had benefits from the current rulers. There is no doubt.

so let's invade all countries with a high inflation rate?

and I guess you know the world is not as simple as just one number. in the context of forced petro-dollar, sanctions, etc.

it's a feel good argument. who shows you some smiling faces? how did it turn out in history?
you think they are less oppressed now because some foreigners want to rule?
how old are you? when did they tell you that last time and how did it work out?

"we invade and loot, but here look at some smiling faces, all is good. don't ask any questions."

imo a naive view that's only there to make you feel ok and that you do not need to ask any questions.

just look at history.

who tells you they do and it’s a majority?

who and how many people would applaude if Trump (or pretty much any leader is taken out?)

seem to me you question nothing.

so which all corrupt leaders of the world should be taken out?
and what happens then?
when was this ever a good idea?
can you even define the "corrupt" that you use there?

just the same dumb sheep they claim not to be.