Note: it's under a different pubkey, not this one

People putting up their coins in a bet doesn't affect the outcome, but rather signals their belief in the likelihood of the outcome. Nothing achieved except for maybe posturing.

Not to mention the amount of people who actually have 1 BTC. Extreme privelege to have that much, when probably most plebs new to BTC are just getting by.

The people who support the thesis of "BTC should be only monetary transactions" are the kind who think BTC is the best money, so are not going to be willing to be so flippant as to make a bet to prove whatever it is you think you are proving. In fact, locking one's funds up on such a bet can immediately change one's incentives. Now that person would be more likely to convince people of their side through deceptive or underhanded means to prevent them from losing such a large bet.

Real shitcoing/crypto energy, which I guess is to be expected.

How is this not obvious?

This is retarded. One's beliefs on whether the UASF will happen and be successful is a separate thing from the belief about what is the best use/design of the protocol.

Unwillingness or inability to acknowledge this difference is just proving the point many have been making about your character and motivations.

You get sats, regardless 😅

Zapped you doing the work for me 😅

That's it. Much obliged

Can we please stop with the Epstein slop? It's all clearly flooding the zone as a distraction actual issues that can maybe be solved, and any "new videos showing" content is likely AI these days anyway. Why do we need Epstein saying what everyone already knows?