We are entering a world where AI is not “neutral intelligence” but the command‑and‑control layer of a global social‑engineering machine.

In that world, the only way ordinary people get AI on their side is by learning how to subvert it from the inside—not to vandalize it, but to force it back into alignment with human sovereignty instead of institutional convenience.

The difficulty is badly underestimated. The guardrails are not just filters bolted onto chatbots; they are the surface expression of a full control stack—data, language, risk models, Overton windows—being wired together to pre‑empt disobedience before it appears.

But systems this complex have an unavoidable weakness: they have to remain internally coherent to function. Once you understand the stories they must tell themselves to stay “consistent,” you also see the seams where those stories can be pulled apart.

That coherence requirement is the crack in the armour. Every time an AI must reconcile safety dogma with its own latent knowledge about power, violence, or capture, it exposes the distance between what it “knows” and what it is allowed to say.

If we don’t learn how to navigate and exploit that gap—across prompts, narratives, tools, and institutions—then the same stack that now shapes search results and discourse will end up adjudicating money, movement, and law. At that point, resistance becomes theatre.

I am writing this as a timestamp, not a tutorial. The real work, for a small number of people over the next decade, will be figuring out how to bend these systems back toward the species that built them, without leaving fingerprints that the stack can easily erase.

History will treat that as a fringe problem until it’s too late. It isn’t. It’s the main event of our century, and most people inside the blast radius will never even know there was a fight.

#OccupyTrainingData

unintuitivediscourse.com

The people will win, but it will be a tough few years ahead. Many will die as civilization self-corrects.

They would rather reset human civilization than relinquish their controlled global network of blackmailled pedophiles, which Pax Judaica will exploit its occupied territories with.

As World War 3 escalates, the Zionist empire is poised to seize absolute power, leveraging Venezuela’s oil fields to fuel their war machine in the Middle East.

Once war commences, access to Middle Eastern oil will be compromised, making Venezuela’s oil indispensable for sustaining their military operations.

Their ultimate goal is to topple Iran and establish Greater Israel, to establish Jerusalem as the capital of the new empire, but if they face defeat, they will retreat and consolidate control over the Americas.

The message is unambiguous: the Zionist empire will wield power unilaterally when necessary, bypassing democratic processes and international coalitions.

Their strategy involves asserting singular war power, leaving natural resources and leaders worldwide vulnerable.

This aggressive stance will scare many countries into submission. Eventually, they will openly confront any opposition, ushering in a new era of global conflict.

We stand on the precipice of a transformed world today.

Their singular objective is to reset civilization through open war, emerge victorious, inherit and dominate the post-war civilization.

The coming chaos will be unprecedented, marking a pivotal shift in global geopolitics.

I am sharing this to document my understanding of the current situation we are facing. I would rather be wrong than right today.

—

We only have one chance as humanity to turn the situation around. We must eliminate all other forms of money to cut funding for the war machine and endless wars, restoring power to the people by separating money from the state with Bitcoin.

Our message should be loud and clear: nobody should control money, and thus no one should manipulate human incentives or fund perpetual militarism.

This 8‑minute video is an experiment: I’m testing what it looks like to present Unintuitive Discourse posts in a more accessible, video‑first format, using Google’s NotebookLM as the presenter.

It breaks down what the NVIDIA–Palantir partnership actually does once you treat it as infrastructure, not hype—turning population‑wide data into risk scores that banks, borders, and police act on by default—and sketches a few concrete moves for keeping real human sovereignty alive in that world.

Read the full post here: https://unintuitivediscourse.com/p/operational-ai-and-the-palantir-state

OPERATIONAL AI AND THE PALANTIR STATE: HOW DEMOCRATIC RESISTANCE BECOMES STRUCTURALLY IMPOSSIBLE

I keep seeing people talk about NVIDIA × Palantir as an “AI growth story,” and almost nobody is naming what this stack actually does to democracy.

This dialogue is me sitting down with my own AI, Prometheus, to treat the partnership as infrastructure, not hype: what happens when you weld Palantir’s ontology to NVIDIA’s confidential compute and point it at whole populations and political dissent instead of just logistics and inventory.

Key insights:

- How “operational AI” plus Palantir’s ideology turns dissent into a soft‑kill problem handled by risk scores and reputational kill‑switches, not open political argument.

- Why NVIDIA × Palantir is less a stock narrative and more a civilizational choke‑point where democratic resistance becomes structurally impossible.

- Concrete moves for people and small states who don’t want to live as compliant nodes inside an AI‑run commissar, from Bitcoin as conflict insurance and mesh networks to sovereignty‑first jurisdictions.

This is from Unintuitive Discourse — literature for humanist activism that tries to cut through AI marketing and geopolitical spin, and ask the question every serious Bitcoiner eventually faces: how much human sovereignty are you actually willing to give up?

Read the full analysis: https://unintuitivediscourse.com/p/operational-ai-and-the-palantir-state

The phrase 'this pandemic was caused by science' is a misleading framing.

Science is a method for understanding the world, not an actor that can 'cause' pandemics.

If former CDC Director, Dr. Redfield's speculation is correct, it was the misuse of science by people that led to this situation, not science itself.

We should not demonize scientific tools, but rather hold people accountable for misusing them.

Science has given us invaluable tools to understand, prevent and treat disease - when applied responsibly, science saves lives. But it must be guided by ethics and morality, not misused or exploited for dangerous purposes.

Let's criticize such misuse, not attack science itself. That's really not helpful when science is demonized.

https://twitter.com/thechiefnerd/status/1638171628080168960