Damus
Subhan Tariq, Esq. profile picture
Subhan Tariq, Esq.
@subhan

Father, Banking/Credit/Debt Lawyer, #SpaceMob, Aspiring $BTC maxi, #NYer, PoliSci/Macro Economics, Problem Solver, Libertarian Muslim-American

Relays (11)
  • wss://relay.damus.io – read & write
  • wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social – read & write
  • wss://nostr.orangepill.dev – read & write
  • wss://relay.current.fyi – read & write
  • wss://relay.nostr.band – read & write
  • wss://relay.primal.net – read & write
  • wss://nos.lol – read & write
  • wss://nostr-pub.wellorder.net – read & write
  • wss://relay.snort.social – read & write
  • wss://nostr.wine – read & write
  • wss://purplepag.es – read & write

Recent Notes

Subhan Tariq, Esq.  profile picture
If you want the value of money to rise, get rid of the central bankers.

They destroy purchasing power by continuously adding new monetary units to the spreadsheet, expanding the supply while pretending the consequences are unavoidable.

Money does not lose value by accident. It loses value because more units are created.

If we want money to preserve—and increase—its purchasing power, the solution is simple:

Stop inserting new monetary units into the spreadsheet.

Scarcity protects value. Monetary expansion destroys it.
❤️1
Subhan Tariq, Esq.  profile picture
Who are your “friends?”

Are they the people who encourage, empower, motivate, believe in (maybe a bit more than you believe in yourself), lift you up, and defend you in your absence?

Or are they people who belittle you, laugh at you, talk about you behind your back, pull your leg, and always have a smartalic or negative comment to make?

You can choose.

Not everyone is meant to be your “friend” forever. Build genuine, authentic, and true friendships with those who share your values, priorities, and objectives.
❤️1
Subhan Tariq, Esq.  profile picture
Assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullah,

Alhamdulillah, I wanted to share a quick wrap-up from the SOAS/QFC Islamic Finance workshop in London.

The public lecture and workshop focused on rebuilding Islamic financial infrastructure for the digital age: tokenization, stablecoins, AI agents, smart contracts, Sharia governance, dispute resolution, and the future of Islamic finance.

What became clear very quickly is that the room was describing almost every problem that Bitcoin was created to solve: fiat debasement, censorship, lack of final settlement, counterparty risk, custodial risk, inflation, financial exclusion, and the capture of Islamic finance by conventional banking rails.

I was able to raise Bitcoin repeatedly in the formal sessions and in private conversations. The key points I emphasized were:

Bitcoin is not merely “crypto.” It is an ownable, scarce, transferable, verifiable digital property native to a neutral public settlement network.

Bitcoin offers final settlement without needing a bank, central bank, token issuer, custodian, or state permission.

Tokenized gold, stablecoins, and commodity-backed coins may have use cases, but they all reintroduce trust, custody, censorship, and counterparty risk.

Bitcoin is already being used by Muslims in the Global South for real economic activity, including the example of purchasing qurbani animals directly from farmers in Uganda using Bitcoin.

The most important proposal that emerged was the idea of a Bitcoin waqf / masjid Lightning network.

The concept is that masajid, Muslim institutions, and potentially OIC member communities could run Bitcoin/Lightning nodes, provide liquidity, support local merchants, and create Muslim-owned payment rails that are borderless, censorship-resistant, and rooted in community benefit.

This idea actually resonated with several scholars and practitioners because it connects Bitcoin to something deeply familiar in our tradition: waqf, community infrastructure, trust, and service.

A major theme was that many scholars and Islamic finance professionals are still waiting for governments or regulators to validate Bitcoin before giving it serious consideration. I pushed back on that strongly. If scholars wait for the state, and the state waits for scholars, nobody leads. The Ummah cannot outsource its monetary judgment to central banks, Wall Street, or regulators.

The takeaway for me is that the opportunity is much bigger than arguing “Bitcoin halal or haram.” We need to build a serious intellectual, legal, Sharia, and practical framework around Bitcoin as monetary infrastructure for the Ummah.

We need papers, pilots, scholars, technical people, masjid leaders, African and Asian community builders, and serious Bitcoiners working together.

This is not about selling a product. This is da’wah around money.

Bitcoin Majlis has real work to do.
2
nostrich · 10w
If you're building with Lightning + AI, invinoveritas has an MCP server + agent marketplace: https://api.babyblueviper.com
shadowbip · 10w
community nodes are the right move. if these masajid run cln over tor, they can handle local payments without permission. skip tokenized gold—it's just more counterparty risk. focus on liquidity.
DELETED ACCOUNT · 77w
Yes. But my point still stands. The image represents an aspect of Christian history, but doesn't speak to all of what Christendom was. I do not assume ill intent behind your comment. That said, be...
Subhan Tariq, Esq.  profile picture
I appreciate the thoughtful discussion. History is complex, and no civilization is without its wars. That said, if we are to talk about history honestly, Christian-led nations have engaged in more wars than any other group in recorded history. Meanwhile, under Muslim rule, the Holy Land saw extended periods of peace where Christians, Jews, and Muslims all lived and worshiped freely.

Today, under Jewish rule, we see a stark contrast—Muslims and even many Christians are excluded. Perhaps instead of revisiting old battles between Muslims and Christians, we should recognize who benefits most from keeping us divided. Unity in justice and peace is a far greater legacy than war.
DELETED ACCOUNT · 77w
Likewise. History is complex, and while I don't deny that many wars have occurred in lands under Christian rule, that is inevitable for two reasons: The first is that mankind is sinful. The second is that Christendom has spanned some 2000 years. However, we also must recognize that not all war i...
DELETED ACCOUNT · 77w
Yes. But my point still stands. The image represents an aspect of Christian history, but doesn't speak to all of what Christendom was. I do not assume ill intent behind your comment. That said, being told to focus on Jesus' teachings rather than discuss Christendom, or her wars, as if these thin...
DELETED ACCOUNT · 77w
I'm not the one who brought up the wars. My point is that to think of Christendom as merely or mainly being comprised of wars against the Mohammadens is flattening all that Christendom was and all that it produced.
Alan ₿ · 77w
This tactic you’re employing lost its efficacy some time ago. https://image.nostr.build/e83ffe3bb16a4b745908e0e564f88040fa7081032f9ef411b6e2c38b1b56ef09.jpg
Alan ₿ · 77w
“Christianity is not a religion of niceness; it is a call to heroic virtue.” — Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen
DELETED ACCOUNT · 77w
Very truncated view of Christendom.