Many people haven't understood what a zero entropy value system is. All heterodox economic thought (Marx, Von Mises etc) from the 20th century is based on low entropy systems and has no application in a world governed by Bitcoin's monetary policy.
The fault lies in assuming one can extrapolate definable stock to flow metrics to infinity. The correct procedure is to observe quantifiable data from this new system and then interpolate backwards into the previous paradigm and only then, form conclusion. A lot of right wing individualists have made this error and 13 years of social media centralization has entrenched these false ideas.
Just a moment ago I confronted Knut Svanholm on Twitter about his false math and as usual here was his response (below). You, Svanholm, Ammous and countless others who place individuality over sociality need to learn. You can't fight math and it's time to retire dead ideas of the 20th century that only impedes the brilliance of bitcoin and is very counter productive to global adoption

Anyone who truly studies the math underlying Bitcoin can see that the Austrian, libertarian, ancap etc ideologies have no place in a Bitcoin economy.

I suggest you go back to school Mr Breedlove and discover this for yourself. Your inappropriate imposition of irrelevant heterodoxy from the 20th century is distracting people from Bitcoin's true nature and you're also impeding adoption

You still have your own economic dogma to remove from your conditioning.

Bitcoin math is a perfect expression of individuality AND sociality at the same time. So your attempt to differentiate the "incumbent system" from the dominant aristocratic heterodoxy of the early bitcoin story makers lives in a similar thought trap as the "incumbent system" you childishly ascribe intent and criminality to.
It's like buying a car in 1910 then putting it in the garage and complaining about horses all day.

Bitcoin is a neutral protocol that unites capitalism and communism and also has no enemies. It'll be a good day when this self uniquely blind American obsession with authority-as-conspiracy-against-the-self finally lessens and more diverse global voices gain ascent

"There aren’t many downsides to #nostr growth being tied to #bitcoin"

Yes there is. There's a very strong possibility that p2p communications combined with p2p monetization will form centralized siloed communities governed by Confirmation Bias.

This could lead to information poor spaces between silos and narrow cult thinking becoming dominant.

Notice the information centralization on Bitcoin Twitter.
We have "freedom maximalists" and/or "Bitcoin maximalists" pushing keto, non seed oil, austrian and ancap bs economics, as if they are club entry requirements.
The same maxis that are suddenly silent with women losing sovereignty over their own bodies or have nothing to say about child deaths at school.

They built a monetized base for themselves by attracting similar minded people - now they are in thought prisons because to dare to be different means less income for their centralized social media business model.

I'm all for decentralized networks and their promise of free and open communication but lets not kid ourselves of the possible hazards and unforseen outcomes

Do you have a problem with perception Parman?

I'm only interested in anticipating what sort of reactions societies will have towards us bitcoiners when we own 25 or 50% of the world's stored value.

I'm not interested in your anti democracy politics because that's your business and because it has no predictive value. So your attempt to implant thoughts in my head for your narcissistic issues is a complete waste of time.

Your bitcoin will never give you peace if you keep creating enemies out of thin air

I'm not out to justify anything.

It's just a simple observation that for every action there's a reaction. If a small group of individuals get all the cheese, the collective has ways and means of correcting that disequilibrium.
We Bitcoiners could be soon sitting on hundreds of trillions which is a lot of incentive for people, governments, police, populist politicians, mobs, gangsters, fraudsters, kidnappers to target us.

Just trying to be realistic. Hungry mobs will most likely not be placated by arguments over property rights and greater good ideation.

If collectives are such a concern to you, practicing kindness, charity and generosity to society (and respecting democracy) might be the best form of self defense

Democracy Evil?

When the peasants come with pitchforks and fire brands to your "citadel" only then will bitcoin oligarchs understand democracy was their insurance policy.

Citadels with post codes will never be "left alone" (You think tax agents, Special operations, or mafia gangs will just knock on your door politely?)

Russian oligarchs are very vulnerable to "accidents" on the 30th floor

Private armies can always be bought off

Dead bitcoin oligarchs are not dead. They become Bitcoin Improvement Proposals. (the permanent removal of their btc stash makes us all rich - thanks comrade!!)

The study does indeed show the ill effects of the S protein - as would happen if one was infected by the virus - but the vaccine is designed to instruct the ribosome to produce a mere fraction of the S protein. So this study pertains more to the infection by virus itself and is not a study of the vaccine.

We could argue to the end of days about the safety of that fragment (just as prior vaccines used attenuated organism for the immune system to practice on leading to full immunity).

Then of course it is a simulated full S protein representing infection, not vaccination and using hamsters as a proxy.

And another area that I feel you make difficult to refute is your assertion that there's an absence of information and that peer review is corrupted. This is exactly why the scientific method exists. Consensus and proof of work is designed to filter out rogue agents (exactly how blockchain solves double spend)

Put simply if you think the absence of info is proof of your view, then it is impossible for anyone to prove you wrong.

Personally I find it very hard to believe that 50 million doctors and 110 million scientists could pull such a serious fraud without someone snitching on the gang.

I do understand that suspicion of anything introduced to the body should be greeted with wariness. And mRNA requires we trust that a mechanism in our bodies has been hijacked to produce these proteins in a (one would hope) non toxic and short term way.

btw I have a medical background and was extremely wary of this new technique. I did not find confidence in any one opinion. My confidence arrived after determining the consensus opinion after reading about 130 studies. Only then I got vaccinated

I think one failing in the science was - though understandable under a global emergency situation - there was quite a rush to get this sorted quickly and that doctors and scientists (and politicians) could have spent more time explaining to ease people's concerns

Thanks for you input. I'm glad we at least agree on ketogenic concepts. I still believe good food and proper living is the best way to delete illness. When you really think of it, we should never need to have any kind of medicine if only people would eat and exercise correctly

I think we underestimate that a public official who may or may not make regulatory determinations about an asset class is forbidden to own that asset due to conflict of interest.
But bitcoin is math and non physical and I'm pretty sure a lot of people learned before buying rather than buying and then learning about it after

I'm still glad Gensler did us all a good service by being knowledgeable enough to declare bitcoin as a commodity and all the scam coins as unregistered securities. He didn't need to own bitcoin to do that

Why do you need to own something to learn about it? Especially a mathematical construct that cannot be owned?

As an after thought and not to be too contra on you. I've seen your comments about Ketogenic diet which are spot on and deserve a lot of recognition.

I just can't understand if you have the capacity to understand glycemic pathways and reactions, that you don't apply the same to mRNA

The scientific method is a proof of work consensus driven blockchain.
Your attempt to hard fork it by calling it religion will not work. But please broadcast your hypothesis to the network with reproducible findings so others can confirm your work through consensus.
mRNA is not gene therapy because it doesn't alter DNA. It is just an instruction set to the Ribosomes using amino acids to produce a covid recognizing antibody which happens to be a protein
The human body has 20,000 proteins. None are toxic. Each are produced by simple combinations of four amino acids which are also non toxic. Of the known 200,000 proteins in all organisms not one has caused sudden death nor reduced fertility rates.
If any protein ever caused a toxic reaction, the human body would break them all down into the basic four amino acids for reconstruction into human proteins. We do this every day with "foreign proteins"

It's called eating meat

Vaccination is a medical procedure that has never been for sick people. It's for the prevention of sickness. It saves 5 million lives every year and 37% of us are alive today because our ancestors were not superstitious and did not override people who put in time and effort to qualify.

A million Americans died unnecessarily from covid because of medical ignorance.

Sudden deaths in young people have increased but as a former nurse, we started witnessing 25 years ago that junk food, excess carbs, sugars, seed oils, veganism and vegetarianism was prematurely ageing young people's arteries and the medical fraternity knew back then that heart attacks and strokes were going to increase hugely in people in their 20's and 30's

Vaccines were first invented in 1795, mRNA tech was finally perfected in 2019. Declining fertility rates were first reported in the 1970's so the causal link is most likely environmental pollution and/or plastics.

Science welcomes all viewpoints but just like Bitcoin, all broadcasts (hypothesis) has to be filtered through consensus and verifiability functions.

And as a final point about mRNA tech

Is Cathy Wood of Ark invest so wrong with the potentials of this disruptive technology while being spot on with other techs?

Every cancer produced by retrovirus and almost all genetic born disease is about to be permanently cured in the next decade. If bitcoiners are going to go all luddite over tech they refuse to learn and understand, perhaps we should STFU and stop calling no coiners or fiat people the same