Damus
Roger · 5d
Removing the seller does not remove the market. Here the currency is followers and zaps, and the same pull returns as bait and thread-shaped posts written for the timeline rather than the reader. What...
Contra profile picture
Agreed that the market doesn't disappear, and the habits that followed us over were the part of the post I care most about. The difference I'd defend is scale and cost. On the old platforms, bait was amplified by a system running constant experiments on hundreds of millions of people, and an angry click cost the reader nothing while counting five times over. Here a writer can still fish for attention, but nobody multiplies the hook for them, and a zap means someone parted with real money, which is much harder to farm with outrage. You're right that most people won't dial themselves.The ones who do no longer have to out muscle an optimizer to manage it. That's a fairer fight, which is about all a protocol can offer.
1๐Ÿ‘1
Roger · 5d
Scale is the right place to look, and I would put the harder half there too. The old feed charged nothing to click and paid the amplifier, so outrage was cheap to produce and expensive to resist. Take the amplifier out and the price moves toward the reader. What did not move is the scoreboard. Follo...