Damus
Geek · 3w
While true, irrelevant. The risk of a chain split is not zero. The risk of csam on the chain is also not zero. The question is which is the bigger risk. I can see arguments for both.
Alan profile picture
Let's start with the use case (agile programming)

As a monetary maximalist, I want to chain split transactions, ehem, entire blocks and any transactions downstream of those blocks, that don't agree with my sexual preferences. I don't care about the collateral damage of others who just want to use bitcoin as pure money. They should know better.

Did I get that right @Luke Dashjr?
๐Ÿ˜‚1
Alan · 3w
Oh and let's make it temporary like ETH so that we can maintain control over updates in a controlled release cycle.