Damus
aaaaa · 127w
Bits. And use the kebab ๐Ÿ˜„
Derek Ross · 127w
Sats is a dumb name, IMO, but it follows what we already know, such as dollars and cents. We've been able to figure that out. Zaps the standard.
LWB · 127w
Some men just want to watch the world burns
MAstr · 127w
Would make #walletofsatoshi a fraud instantly because everybody new would think they can get Bitcoin for free. That would be the right answer to your question. How would that be than on #NOSTR Like: "Look dudes, nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx zapped me 42 bit...
๐–‹๐–Ž๐–†๐–™๐–‰๐–Š๐–“๐–Ž๐–Š๐–— (ยฏ`โ—•โ€ฟโ—•ยดยฏ) · 127w
Bad idea. It is a homage to the creator and sending .00000001 bitcoin to someone is stupid
Mabardino ๐Ÿ€ · 127w
No no no
0x7C2f · 127w
Bad idea...
Keith Mukai · 127w
ATROCIOUS. Singular "bitcoin" for the whole unit. "bitcoins" is Boomer shit no matter which level of denomination we're talking about. Plural "sats" for the fractional unit. It just sounds cool.
Nice and Kind Vic · 127w
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/002/825/33d.gif
IntuitiveGuyโ˜ฏ๏ธ · 127w
No Sir. 1BTC = 1BTC 1BTC > 1sat ๐Ÿ˜‚
tigs · 127w
If this is 1... What is 2??! ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿคฃ
UnicornใŠ™Whisperer · 127w
Sats are actually bitcoins But those with Adjustment Disorders like most older people with conservative values, and even younger ones with AS, HFA, or ASD have full-on adjustment disorders too and will react violently when faced with sudden, unwanted change so it's something to deal with, because ...
Lonelypumpkins · 127w
Nice troll guys
0xtr · 127w
๐Ÿ˜‚
Toboโšก · 127w
highly regarded
FiddleHodlHomestead · 127w
Is this a joke? In case not, no!! definitely not... way too confusing!
redsun · 127w
imo Good idea in long term. there is no such thing as a whole bitcoin
G.M.Joe · 127w
No benefits. Only downsides. Why even have this idea?
binmucker · 127w
I think people will look at Bitcoiners with confusion when they say "1 whole bitcoin = 100 million bitcoins"
Huey · 127w
The term bitcoin would ideally be applied to a unit with a sane value. As it stands a lot of people think of bitcoin as expensive when that is a completely arbitrary valuation. Right now 1 sat is too small to be the standard unit, and 1 bitcoin is too big. I think Adam Back has the right idea and ...
Eduardo Prospero · 127w
Hell no! is what I think. We don't need MORE confusion. We have enough with the "bitcoin the asset" and "Bitcoin the network" nonsense.
urantia · 127w
sats are sats - bitcoins are bitcoins so big hell no from urantia
franzap · 127w
No!
dreamon · 127w
That ship has sailed IMHO. Sats it is.
Reid Walley · 127w
Nostr and Lightning is the reason I dig Sats as a unit.
Indonesia โšก Lea Octaviani ๐ŸŠ · 127w
sats is better. in sankrit , sat mean truth, unchangeable..
Ted Bergeron · 127w
The downside is no one can tell how much Bitcoin you are talking about. "Would you be interested in selling your car for two bitcoins?" The scammers will have so much fun with your idea.
haaaa · 118w
I dig it. one tenth of any amount of gold is still gold. why would the same standard not apply to bitcoin?