> Its increasing
There's not been a significant increase in usage of large op returns over the past half year. The utxo set has been steadily shrinking in the same time frame.
The chart you showed s...
>There's not been a significant increase in usage of large op returns over the past half year.
That needs a proof. But in any case the potential to be used and abused is there. OP_RETURN is Welcoming big data, spam, jpegs and any filth.
In the same time not solving inscriptions. It is simply an attack on Bitcoin that Core did, after this meeting with Citrea.
BIP110 solves what needs to be solved. Small OP_RETURNs are not a problem. There is 1200 times different between 83 Bytes and 100 000 Bytes. The later is abuse.
BIP110 solves also other very very important things. Not sure why you are against it.
That needs a proof. But in any case the potential to be used and abused is there. OP_RETURN is Welcoming big data, spam, jpegs and any filth.
In the same time not solving inscriptions. It is simply an attack on Bitcoin that Core did, after this meeting with Citrea.
BIP110 solves what needs to be solved. Small OP_RETURNs are not a problem. There is 1200 times different between 83 Bytes and 100 000 Bytes. The later is abuse.
BIP110 solves also other very very important things. Not sure why you are against it.