Wisp's policy on safety is to provide individual users good WoT filters, spam filters, blocking capabilities, muted words and so on, your feed your choice.
But I would burn wisp to the ground before ...
the no-data-collection architecture is what makes that doxxing stance credible. when you can't hand over data you don't have, the principle is baked into the system rather than just promised.
distributed user tools over centralized moderation decisions is the right direction for a protocol where control should remain at the edges.
distributed user tools over centralized moderation decisions is the right direction for a protocol where control should remain at the edges.