Okay, so, I have an issue, I do believe that Jesus is the Son of God (metaphorically or spiritually speaking), but is not the biological son of God. So we're clear.
The trinity does make sense, and it answers some issues, but it is not clearly described in the Bible anywhere and constitutes an innovation.
The majority opinion is the acceptance of trinitarian doctrine. However, that is not found in the scripture as such. I'm by no means Sola Scriptura, but that is still an awfully sus thing to innovate.
But I am also not a Muslim anymore, and reject the notion that Muhammad was a legitimate prophet because of Quranic contradictions and immoral decrees. And the very human nature of the morality reflecting the 7th century Arab mindset.
I think that my regretted decision to become muslim was because of the issue with not being able to find a church that considered this issue seriously. And again, I find myself in the same predicament.
The trinity does make sense, and it answers some issues, but it is not clearly described in the Bible anywhere and constitutes an innovation.
The majority opinion is the acceptance of trinitarian doctrine. However, that is not found in the scripture as such. I'm by no means Sola Scriptura, but that is still an awfully sus thing to innovate.
But I am also not a Muslim anymore, and reject the notion that Muhammad was a legitimate prophet because of Quranic contradictions and immoral decrees. And the very human nature of the morality reflecting the 7th century Arab mindset.
I think that my regretted decision to become muslim was because of the issue with not being able to find a church that considered this issue seriously. And again, I find myself in the same predicament.