Damus
Lyn Alden · 56w
People often assume that whoever their god is, that it is standing with them specifically. In the US, they often separate this view along party lines. Conservatives to some extent imagine Jesus stan...
OgFOMK ArTS profile picture
When you get a chance get a King James Bible with Strong's Concordance of Greek and Hebrew. You will start to pick up on the words consistently translated and at deeper levels of meaning. Amazon has a nice Kindle version or you can use this:

---

AndBible: Bible Study to you. It is a powerful, yet easy to use, offline Bible study application for Android.

Install it from Play Store: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=net.bible.android.activity

Read more & more install options: https://andbible.org

---

Furthermore you will see who is following the Bible and who is not. More importantly you will tap into something for yourself.

There is a lot of rhetoric and misinformation going around that is most definitely not true. For insurance Jesus was opposed to soft men and considered them diseased. The specific term was malakas.

---

Mat 11:8 KJV But what went ye out for to see? A man clothed in soft raiment? behold, they that wear soft clothing are in kings’ houses.

03120 (StrongsGreek)
μαλακός
malakovs malakos {mal-ak-os'}
of uncertain affinity; soft, i.e. fine (clothing); figuratively, a catamite:--effeminate, soft.

Shared using AndBible: Bible Study. (https://andbible.github.io)

---

The Bible is very well documented and the language is not so archaic considering that modern mankind has documented two great years 26,000 years times 2 in art and artifact. The arrangement of constellations has slight variations that were only possible in a great year configuration. That's 50,000 years. So the Bible scripture is a modern document of oral tradition.

Praying attention to the proponents and opposition is superficially pop culture. Deeper investigation will lead to careful insight.