Damus
corndalorian · 148w
Wouldn’t replying an emoji be just as effective and probably quicker? This is overly complicated and messy. Replies are already a great solution for when more emotion needs to be expressed.
jimbocoin 🃏 profile picture
From a protocol perspective, they’re almost identical anyway. A reaction note uses the “content” field to contain the single character reaction, usually “+” or “👍”, but I’ve seen others like “🐾”. The difference is that reactions use kind=7 whereas regular notes are of kind=1.

A nostr client could choose to interpret and display single-character/emoji reply notes (kind=1) as reactions. This would allow the full range of emoji reactions while adding some friction (takes more steps to post an emoji reply than just tapping a reaction button).
1🤙1
The Fishcake (nostr.build) · 148w
Yet another way to abuse it by the client. If Damus chose to display like as skull, that would definitely be a wrong signal at extreme. So, I say note with sig is way to go. User types in the content, and that is what is displayed! 🐶🐾🫡